Monti refuses to be Berlusconi’s scapegoat

The resignation of Italy's Prime Minister, announced on December 7, has caused some concern in Italy and abroad. But in the face of Silvio Berlusconi's attempt to exploit social unrest, what other path was open to a technocratic government that has made such an effort to rehabilitate the country?

Published on 10 December 2012 at 15:53

Mario Monti took a day to reflect. Then he did the only thing he could do that was consistent with his character, his life and his way of governing: ensure the 2013 budget would pass, and resign.

It was not merely that he could not accept accusations from the person who had handed over to him a country in shambles. Nor did he intend to beg for weeks for the confidence of Italy's parliament in each measure he proposed.

Simply put, he had no desire to take one more step with the one who has now concluded that the fault of all the evil lies in the single currency. “I'm not going to Brussels to shield those who are making anti-European declarations. I want nothing to do with them,” Monti stated very clearly to the President of the Republic on December 8 when he announced his intention to resign.

It was a clear and transparent gesture, which obliges everyone to take responsibility, and leaves Berlusconi alone with his convulsions and his flip-flopping.

Receive the best of European journalism straight to your inbox every Thursday

Intolerable behaviour

No one wants to discuss the right of "The Cavaliere" to run again (even if, for a year, he insisted he had no such intention), but it is intolerable that the majority shareholder in the technocratic government – which, let's remember, still includes the ex-prime minister who had left Italy on the brink – should wake up one morning and wash its hands of it.

It is intolerable that Monti is being accused of having caused all of Italy's problems, without acknowledging the work he did in just a single year. Faced with the inability to govern and the profound distrust of Italians in the party system, Monti's government was supposed to safeguard the balance-sheets of the State and to carry us over to fresh elections.

The pact was that each would share his burden of responsibility (and unpopularity) to try to avoid the bankruptcy of the country, without succumbing to the lure of populism and the temptation to profit from social unrest.

Handing back the keys to the government

So how then could the leader of the People of Freedom, Berlusconi's party, Angelino Alfano, think that Monti could carry on governing after Alfano had formally withdrawn that party's support in the National Assembly? Only a politician of the old school used to making deals and compromises on all sides would pretend it meant nothing. Monti, in contrast, took note and decided to hand back the keys to the government.

Thus, for the first time in the history of the Republic, we will be going to the polls in winter. Maybe even in the first half of February, if the budget vote passes and Parliament is dissolved before Christmas.

After trying to put things in order for the last 12 months, we have been wheeled back into the emergency room, suffering from spasms of terrible politics. With all the efforts and sacrifices we have made, we deserved better.

It is high time Italy became a normal country – predictable and, who knows, boring as well. A country that does not have to be ashamed and that can take a seat in Europe and be heard. For a year, we were nearly there.

View from the right

Goodbye, Monti, and good riddance

“I want to be sincere and to avoid joining those who are sinking into despondency, begging Professor Monti not to resign, and who will thank him for the job he has done,” writes Alessandro Sallusti the day after the Italian government leader announced that he would step down. The director of the daily Il Giornale, Silvio Berlusconi’s brother, continues —

I am on the side of the thousands of workers who have lost their jobs and the thousands of companies that have closed down under the enlightened leadership of the Monti government. We cannot live on so-called international credibility. We should re-establish the democracy suspended more than a year ago during the blitz mounted by the Italian president. We should retake control of the national sovereignty that has stupidly been entrusted to banks and a German-managed Europe. We should reassert the freedom to make our own decisions, take action, and to suffer if need be, not because we are subject to the whims of a privileged caste acclaimed by the press barons, but because we have chosen to do so. Let’s vote and make ourselves heard, regardless of the consequences. We should be proud that we have had the courage to put an end to a technocratic government that brought us nothing and was not about to bring us anything except for further hardship.

Tags

Was this article useful? If so we are delighted!

It is freely available because we believe that the right to free and independent information is essential for democracy. But this right is not guaranteed forever, and independence comes at a cost. We need your support in order to continue publishing independent, multilingual news for all Europeans.

Discover our subscription offers and their exclusive benefits and become a member of our community now!

Are you a news organisation, a business, an association or a foundation? Check out our bespoke editorial and translation services.

Support independent European journalism

European democracy needs independent media. Join our community!

On the same topic