Religion: Is Islam good for Europe?

2 diciembre 2009
El Mundo Madrid

The Swiss don't want this either. Carpet in an Istanbul bazaar. Photo : Markb120/Flickr
The Swiss don't want this either. Carpet in an Istanbul bazaar. Photo : Markb120/Flickr

The Swiss referendum on minarets has re-ignited the debate about Islam in Europe. While Muslim philosopher Tariq Ramadan stresses Muslims’ cultural contributions to Europe, journalist Arcadi Espada argues that religion is not a desirable calling card in Europe.

I understand Tariq Ramadan (more or less) when he says: “It is difficult for ordinary citizens to embrace this new Muslim presence as a positive factor.” Ramadan traces that difficulty to what he calls “so many controversial debates” with which Islam is “connected”: e.g. “violence, extremism, freedom of speech, gender discrimination, forced marriage, to name a few”.

But Ramadan ought to allow that anything affecting freedom and life in general is no minor matter, and each of the debates he mentions affects them utterly. So it does not seem entirely insane for the European public to distrust Muslims. All these “controversial” things are done in Allah’s name, though I have no doubt some acts of kindness may be done in his name as well.

Nevertheless, I do not believe this is the crux of the debate or the grounds for the European rejection, or even disdain, that Ramadan discusses. As a European, I would fain ask him, in all candour, why would Muslims be a positive factor. What defines a Muslim is his faith and that alone. Why then should European secularism accept as “positive” a person whose only calling card is his creed? Would we accept someone who introduces himself in public by saying, “I’m Catholic, in other words, I’m a positive factor”?

Europeans see churches, but not mosques, as cultural

One of the great and hard-earned tenets of Europe is that religion does not open the gates of moral heaven. Religion is but a factor, and a debatable one at that. I can accept Ramadan’s saying that the Arab presence is positive – as though he were saying the same of the Chinese presence. But I fail to see what is positive about the contribution of religiously defined conduct.

What lies behind the Swiss rejection of minarets is, in all likelihood, the very racism and intolerance some believers and laypersons suppose. But there might also be a more subtle and elusive motive that merits consideration. Many Europeans in our day look at the old Christian churches in a manner wholly devoid of faith. They perceive them as purely cultural objects, which they are as well. Now this is very hard to do with minarets, even with what remains of Muslim architecture in Spain. In minarets, old and new alike, religion reigns supreme, alone, despotic. Which is an intrinsically negative factor for present-day Europe.

Factual or translation error? Tell us.